Bito · Tools

Bito

Visit website

At a glance

Price
from 12 $/mo
Vendor
Bito

Specifications & properties

Key decision factors

Pricing model
Paid 1
Tool form
  • Code review
1
Autonomy level
Supervised agent 1
Training on code
No training on user data 1

Pricing

Price from
12 $/mo 1

Integration

IDE integrations
  • VS Code
  • JetBrains
1

Compliance

Self-hosting / on-prem
Yes 1
SOC 2
Yes 1
Report data / suggest a correction

Bito offers an AI Code Review Agent with per-seat pricing, SOC 2 Type II certification, and self-hosted deployment options.

Profile

Bito is an AI-native platform for software teams built around two connected products: AI Architect, a codebase "knowledge graph" that grounds technical design and code generation in a team's actual architecture, and AI Code Reviews, an agentic reviewer that checks pull requests and local changes for bugs and regressions. Both are built by Bito, a developer-tools company whose founders previously built and took public the ad-tech company PubMatic.

Who builds it

  • Bito is developed by Bito, founded in 2021 by Amar Goel, Anand Das, and Mukesh Agarwal.
  • The company is backed by investors including Eniac, NGP Capital, Vela Partners, and NextView Ventures.

Core features

  • AI Architect: builds a knowledge graph from code, commits, docs, and issues; generates feasibility analysis and technical design documents; breaks epics into stories with effort estimates; produces "grounded" code generation with cross-repository awareness for use inside Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and GitHub Copilot.
  • AI Code Reviews: reviews pull requests with cross-repository impact analysis on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, and offers a real-time in-IDE review agent for VS Code, JetBrains, Cursor, and Windsurf that can check local changes, staged commits, or specific commit ranges before a PR is even opened.
  • The IDE review agent is powered by Claude Sonnet 4 and supports 30+ programming languages, with one-click fix application.
  • Integrates with Jira, Linear, Slack, and Confluence for planning and notifications.
  • Bito states plainly on its site that customer code is not stored and is not used to train models.

Pricing

Bito runs two separate pricing tracks:

  • AI Code Reviews (per-seat, billed annually unless noted): Team at $12/month per seat ($15 billed monthly) with 5,000 reviewed lines per seat per month included and $5 per extra 1,000 lines; Professional at $20/month per seat ($25 billed monthly) adds custom review guidelines, auto-learn, and Jira/Confluence integration; Enterprise is custom-priced and adds cross-repo impact analysis, multi-org support, and on-prem options. A 14-day free trial is available with no credit card required.
  • AI Architect (usage-based): Professional and Enterprise tiers are both quoted on a "contact us" basis rather than published as fixed prices; a free tier is available for testing at alpha.bito.ai.

Who it's for

Bito's code-review products suit teams that want automated, codebase-aware PR and pre-commit feedback inside the IDEs and Git platforms they already use, while AI Architect is aimed at larger engineering organizations that want their existing coding agents (Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code) grounded in real system architecture rather than working file-by-file, plus faster onboarding for new engineers who need to understand an unfamiliar codebase.

How it fits the workflow

Rather than positioning itself as a standalone autonomous coding agent, Bito describes its role as a context and quality layer that sits around the agents and Git platforms teams already use. AI Architect is meant to be consulted before and during implementation, feeding cross-repository dependency knowledge into whatever coding agent writes the code, while AI Code Reviews checks the resulting diffs both locally in the IDE and again once a pull request is opened, so issues can surface before as well as after a PR is created. Teams that already rely on Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or Codex for generation can add either or both Bito products without switching their primary coding tool.

Frequently asked questions

Is Bito free or what does it cost?

Bito is not fully free, but it offers a 14-day free trial for its AI Code Reviews Professional plan and a free tier for AI Architect at alpha.bito.ai. Paid AI Code Reviews plans start at $12/month per seat (Team, billed annually) and $20/month per seat (Professional, billed annually), while both AI Architect tiers and Code Review Enterprise are quoted on request rather than listed publicly.

What IDEs and platforms does Bito support?

Bito's AI Code Review agent runs inside VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Cursor, and Windsurf, and it also reviews pull requests directly on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. AI Architect instead plugs into existing coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and GitHub Copilot, plus Jira, Linear, and Slack for planning and notifications.

Does Bito store or train on my code?

No — Bito states on its product page that customer code stays with the customer, is not stored by Bito, and is not used to train any AI model. This applies across its AI Architect and AI Code Reviews products.

What AI model powers Bito's code review?

Bito's AI Code Reviews extension for VS Code is built on Claude Sonnet 4 combined with Bito's own prompt frameworks, according to its Visual Studio Marketplace listing. It supports more than 30 programming languages for review.

What is Bito AI Architect?

AI Architect is Bito's context-layer product: it builds a knowledge graph mapping a codebase's architecture, dependencies, and past decisions, then uses that graph to ground technical design documents, feasibility analysis, and cross-repository code generation. It is meant to feed system-level context into coding agents like Cursor, Claude Code, and GitHub Copilot rather than replace them.

Does Bito replace coding agents like Copilot or Cursor, or work alongside them?

Bito works alongside existing coding agents rather than replacing them. Its AI Architect integrates with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, and GitHub Copilot to supply grounded architectural context, while its separate AI Code Reviews product adds a review layer on top of whatever agent or workflow a team already uses.